Project 2: Stage 3 – Comparison Paper
| Hide Assignment Information | |
| Turnitin™ | |
| This assignment will be submitted to Turnitin™. | |
| Instructions | |
| Stage 3 – Comparison Paper In stage 3, you will write a 1000-1250 word reflective paper to compare your autobiographical story of technology to the biographical information about technology you learned from the person you interviewed. Be sure to include the following in your paper: An introduction the describes the generational and demographical differences between you and the person you interviewed. Select one of your experiences with technology and one of your interviewees experiences that resemble the experiences in the assigned chapters from The Inner Life of Devices for week 8, or any of the other chapters in that book. Identify which chapter from the book you are using and describe similarities and differences between your experience and your interviewee’s. Select one of your experiences with technology and one of your interviewees experiences that resemble the experiences in the assigned chapters from From Curlers to Chainsaws for week 8, or any chapters from that book. Identify which chapter from the book you are using and compare how technology informed your and your interviewee’s generational (Gen X, Gen Z, Boomer etc.), regional, gender, racial, religious, ethnic, familial, class or cultural identity. In your comparisons for #1 and #2, be sure to identify a specific technology and cover any positive or negative impacts of the technology. Note: The experiences you choose for this paper do not necessarily have to appear in your work from stage 1 and stage 2. Conclude your paper with a paragraph about about 5-7 sentences that conveying your general thoughts about how technology and human experiences can shape each other. Make sure to cite your interview and any other resources you have used, including course learning materials, in MLA format at the end of your paper. (sample interview citation) McCarthy, Robert. Interview. Conducted by Iashira Cortez, 20 July 2019. Format Submit this as a Word document. Your completed paper should be 4-5 pages (1000-1250 words) in length and be based on the work you did for stages 1-2. The text of the essay should be typed, double-spaced, and use a common 12 pt. font like Times New Roman or Calibri. | |
| Due Date | |
| Dec 13, 2022 11:59 PM |
Hide Rubrics
Rubric Name: Project 2: Stage 3 – Paper
Print Rubric
| Criteria | Outstanding | Superior | Good/Needs Improvement | Criterion Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduction 10% | 10 pointsThe introduction clearly describes all relevant differences between the student and the interviewee.9-10 points | 8 pointsThe introduction describes differences between the student and the interviewee.7-8 points | 6 pointsThe introduction is missing some of the required information about the student and interviewee.0-6 points | Score of Introduction 10%,/ 10 |
| The Inner Life of Devices compare and contrast 30% | 30 pointsPaper thoughtfully and concretely identifies and describes one experience from interviewee and one experience from the student and relates them to specifics in a relevant chapter of The Inner Life of Devices.27-30 points | 26 pointsPaper identifies and describes one experience from interviewee and one experience from the student and relates them to a chapter of The Inner Life of Devices.20-26 points | 19 pointsPaper does not clearly identify and describe one experience from interviewee and/or one experience from the student. Attempts to relate them to a chapter of The Inner Life of Devices or is missing this aspect.0-19 points | Score of The Inner Life of Devices compare and contrast 30%,/ 30 |
| From Curlers to Chainsaws compare and contrast 30% | 30 pointsPaper thoughtfully and concretely identifies and describes one experience from interviewee and one experience from the student and relates them to specifics in a relevant chapter of From Curlers to Chainsaws with regard to generationational regional, gender, racial, religious, ethnic, familial, class or cultural identity. 27-30 points | 26 pointsPaper identifies and describes one experience from interviewee and one experience from the student and relates them to a chapter of From Curlers to Chainsaws.20-26 points | 19 pointsPaper does not clearly identify and describe one experience from interviewee and/or one experience from the student. Attempts to relate them to a chapter of From Curlers to Chainsaws. or is missing this aspect.0-19 points | Score of From Curlers to Chainsaws compare and contrast 30%,/ 30 |
| Conclusion 20% | 20 pointsPaper includes an insightful concluding paragraph that is the required length and which effectively conveys astute thoughts about how technology and human experiences can shape each other.18-20 points | 17 pointsPaper includes an insightful concluding paragraph that is the required length and which effectively conveys astute thoughts about how technology and human experiences can shape each other. 14-17 points | 13 pointsPaper includes a concluding paragraph that is briefer than the requirements and may not offer sufficient reflection and summarization. Or conclusion is missing.0-13 points | Score of Conclusion 20%,/ 20 |
| Sources 5% | 5 pointsSources, including interview, are properly attributed and cited correctly according to MLA style.4-5 points | 3 pointsSources, including interview, are attributed and cited mostly correctly according to MLA style. There may be one or two minor errors in the citation.2-3 points | 1 pointLess than three resources might be included. Sources are not attributed or cited or no attempt at a full citation is made (i.e. citation may just be a title or a link). Or no resources are credible and/or reliable or resources missing.0-1 points | Score of Sources 5%,/ 5 |
| Writing 5% | 5 pointsGrammatical and structural issues do not impede student’s intended meaning.4-5 points | 3 pointsGrammatical and structural issues impede student’s intended meaning.2-3 points | 1 pointGrammatical and structural issues systemically impede student’s intended meaning throughout the work.0-1 points | Score of Writing 5%,/ 5 |
Total
Score of Project 2: Stage 3 – Paper,
/ 100
Overall Score
Outstanding
90 points minimum
Superior
70 points minimum
Good/Needs Improvement
0 points minimum
Submit Assignment
Expert Answer: Project 2: Stage 3 – Comparison Paper
1153 Words