The objectives of the report:
1- meaning of ‘strategic performance management’.
2- To identify how performance management effect on quality and productivity.
identify importance of monitoring on work performance.
References:
– Harvard style of references.
– Studies between 2014 – 2019
– 50 references
1 attachments
Slide 1 of 1
attachment_1
attachment_1
UNFORMATTED ATTACHMENT PREVIEW
Topic: performance management. The objectives of the report: 1- meaning of ‘strategic performance management’. 2- To identify how performance management effect on quality and productivity. identify importance of monitoring on work performance. There are various theories of performance management can be used on the report: Goal Setting theory, Expectancy theory, Control theory, Justice theory, social cognitive theory ————————————————————————————————————————– Literature Review Evidence of wide reading using appropriate sources should be illustrated. The literature is critically evaluated (in the context of the aim) rather than summarised or discussed. – The review should conclude with a clear conceptual framework (e.g. key themes with which to look at the examples / case studies.) Case Study/Examples: This section concerns the application of knowledge to chosen case study organisations or examples. In all cases these case studies/examples MUST be based on secondary information sources. – The examples/cases should be carefully chosen to reflect both the overall topic area and the aim. Case studies should be described clearly There should be clear links made between the examples /cases and the literature investigated. For example, where examples/cases are doing what the literature suggests, or where they are not, or partially. The similarity/differences should form the basis of a clear discussion. Discussion – knowledge derived from the literature review, and the results of the case/examples. The ‘discussion’ should concern bringing all of this together and synthesising what has been found. Can reasons for differences between theory and practice be identified for example? To what extent is the context important (and perhaps not recognised, or identified, sufficiently within the literature)? Conclusion and Recommendations The conclusion should likewise be looking specifically as to what extent the original aim has been satisfied – did the project achieve what it set out to achieve – – References to the original objectives would support the argument. All of this should be based on the work evidenced in the project and should not rely on new ideas/information suddenly introduced at this stage. Any recommendations should be clearly based on the discussion/conclusion. They should be practical/applied in nature. References: – Harvard style of references. Studies between 2014 – 2019 50 references