Need Help With Law Discussion – Bluebook Format

+44 222 444 1122

Give us a call

11 Vancouver St, London

Get direction

Need Help With Law Discussion – Bluebook Format

 (Need a 400 word response to the discussion with 3 scholarly references)

A lawyer was hired to represent a client on a speeding ticket. The  client resided out of state, so the lawyer appeared in court on behalf  of the client. On the day of trial, the lawyer argued to the court on  behalf of the client and presented a clean driving record to the court.  The court agreed to take the matter under advisement with the intention  of dismissing the summons if the client paid court costs, maintained a  clean driving record for six months, and completed of a driving safety  school. The court set a review date six months from trial to ensure that  the client had completed all required steps.

One week before the review date, the lawyer made contact with the  client to ask if the client had completed all the imposed requirements.  The client indicated that all costs were paid, no new moving violations  had been received, but that the client had yet to complete the driving  school. In fact, the client had been busy and finally scheduled the  driving school for one week after the review date.

The lawyer explained to the client that this likely was insufficient  and that the client could expect a guilty finding if the traffic school  was not completed. The lawyer asked the client to complete the traffic  school before the review date, and to make contact with the lawyer  before the review, to ensure that this was done. The client never  contacted the lawyer.

The lawyer attempted to contact the client immediately before the  review, but the client did not return the lawyer’s call. On the review  date, the lawyer appeared before the court. Not having heard from the  client, the lawyer assumed, but was not sure,  that the client hadn’t finished the traffic school and was waiting for  the judge to enter a finding of guilty. When the client’s case was  called, to the lawyer’s surprise, the judge stated, “It appears  everything is done that needs to be, and nothing is left to do other  than enter a dismissal.”

What ethical duties does the lawyer have to the court and to the  client in this scenario? Discuss. 

Would your answer change from the  perspective of a biblical worldview? 

Would your answer change if the lawyer knew that the client had not completed the traffic school?


With over 10 years in the online academic market, we have accumulated thousands of previously completed questions and answers across the globe. You can gain access to them for a very small fee.

Want to complete your own work?