Management ⇒ Business Law and Ethics ⇒ Business Laws I need a good tutor to do this work a perfectly well. I need a distinction in this I will pay more for this see attached files kindly bud if you are so sure of it thank you
2 attachments
Slide 1 of 2
attachment_1
attachment_1
attachment_2
attachment_2
UNFORMATTED ATTACHMENT PREVIEW
ICT80008 Professional Issues in IT Assignment 3: Reflective Learning Account Rubric EXCEEDS STANDARD Performance Indicators CRITERIA Content High Distinction (HD)/80100 Excellent/exemplary/excee ding high standard Distinction (D)/ 70-79 Very good/ exceeds expectations Outstanding, insightful work. Goes beyond requirements of the task to develop a response, which is thoughtful, reflective, and considers alternative views and makes connections among ideas and information from different sources or from different aspects of the course. Very good work. Purposefully and logically developed. Thoroughly addresses all aspects of the task. Synthesis of details and concepts from various sources or topics shows evidence of sound understanding and thoughtful examination. Reflection demonstrates an excellent degree of critical thinking in applying, analyzing, and evaluating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, media, discussions activities, and/or assignments. Insightful and relevant connections made through contextual explanations, inferences, and examples. Reflection demonstrates high degree of critical thinking in applying, analyzing, and/or evaluating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, media, discussions activities, and/or assignments. Relevant connections made through explanations, inferences, and/or examples. MEETS STANDARD Credit (C)/60-69 Good/Well done Good work. Generally clear, accurate and relevant. Adequately addresses all requirements of the task. Demonstrates understanding of course concepts, with evidence of some thoughtful examination and reflection. Development is generally logical, facts generally correct. Tends to focus on one interpretation. Reflection demonstrates some degree of critical thinking in applying, analyzing, and/or evaluating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, media, discussions activities, and/or assignments. Some connections made through explanations, inferences, and/or examples. Pass (P)/ 50-59 Acceptable/Satisfactory/ Proficient Satisfactory work. Shows basic understanding of concepts with minimal evidence of reflection or thoughtful analysis. Complies with the basic requirements, relies on limited sources of information, little integration of concepts. Reflection demonstrates limited critical thinking in applying, analyzing, and/or evaluating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, media, discussions, activities, and/or assignments Minimal connections made through explanations, inferences, and/or examples. YET TO ACHIEVE MINIMUM STANDARD Fail (N) /0-49 Poor/unacceptable/Not attempted/requires further development/needs improvement Unsatisfactory work. Fails to address the topic in a meaningful way. May be extremely brief, inaccurate, illogical or undeveloped. Reflection lacks critical thinking. Superficial connections are made with key course concepts and course materials, activities, and/or assignments Page 1 of 2 Personal Growth Conveys strong evidence of reflection on own work in the unit. Demonstrates significant personal growth and awareness of deeper meaning through inferences made, examples, well developed insights, and substantial depth in perceptions and challenges. Conveys clear evidence of reflection on own work in the unit. Demonstrates highly satisfactory personal growth and awareness through some inferences made, examples, insights, and challenges. Conveys some evidence of reflection on own work in the unit. Demonstrates satisfactory personal growth and awareness through some inferences made, examples, insights, and challenges. . Conveys limited evidence of reflection on own work in response to the selfassessment questions posed. Demonstrates less than adequate personal growth and awareness through few or simplistic inferences made, examples, insights, and/or challenges that are not well developed. Analysis The reflection moves beyond simple description of the experience to an indepth analysis of how the experience contributed to the understanding of self, others, and/or concepts in the unit The reflection demonstrates excellent connections between the experience and material from other units; past experience; and/or personal goals with implications for future. The language is clear and expressive showing a strong writing style and without grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling errors. The reflection provide clear analysis of how the experience contributed to the understanding of self, others, and/or concepts in the unit The reflection demonstrates attempts to analyse the experience but analysis lacks depth Attempts in applying the learning experience to understanding of self, others, and/or course concepts but fails to demonstrate depth of analysis. The reflection demonstrates clear connections between the experience and material from other units; past experience; and/or personal goals. The reflection demonstrates connections between the experience and material from other units; past experience; and/or personal goals. There is little attempt to demonstrate connections between the learning experience and previous other personal and/or learning experiences No connection to previous learning or experience is attempted. Well written and clearly organized using standard English, characterized by elements of a strong writing style and basically free from grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling errors. Above average writing style and logically organized using standard English with minor errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling. Average and/or casual writing style that is sometimes unclear and/or with some errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling. Poor writing style lacking in standard English, clarity, language used, and/or frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling. Needs work. Interconnections Writing Quality Conveys inadequate evidence of reflection on own work in response to the selfassessment questions posed. Personal growth and awareness are not evident and/or demonstrates a neutral experience with negligible personal impact. Lacks enough inferences, examples, personal insights and challenges. Reflection does not move beyond description of the learning experience(s). Page 2 of 2 ICT80008 Professional Issues in IT – Reflection Guidelines Faculty of Business & Law, Swinburne Business School REFLECTIVE LEARNING ACCOUNT ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES ICT80008 Professional Issues in IT, Semester 1, 2019 Assessment Title: Reflection Due Date: 2nd June, 2019 by 11:59pm Assessment Weighting: 40% Assessment Length: 2,200 words (Your reference list is not included in the Word Limit). Please note that your marker will stop reading at the 2,200 word mark. Individual or Group: Individual Submission: Online via the Turnitin Submission Link. File type MUST be a MS Word Doc. NO hardcopies accepted. See Unit of Study Outline for late submission penalties. Introduction Your final assignment allows you the opportunity to critically self-examine YOUR journey through the ICT80008 unit of study and the processes involved (from individual research to the group dynamics of the interview report and reflecting upon your level of preparedness for being an ICT professional who is/will be faced with an array of issues and challenges). In essence, this assessment wraps the first two assessment items with a personal and professional viewpoint but also seeks you to describe your perceived importance of the role of professional education within the ICT domain, how you are able to go about gaining awareness of the skill set required and ultimately, capturing and utilising these skills and knowledge from your Masters Degree. In order to improve as ICT professionals we need to develop the habit of linking and constructing meaning from our experiences. This practice is referred to as reflection. Reflecting on our experiences encourages insight and learning. Meaning is derived from both the learning content and the process of learning it. When we are continually reflecting on our learning process we are actively engaged in our learning. Reflection can help you to better understand your strengths and weaknesses and identify areas for improvement. It can help you recognize possible areas of bias and assumptions that limit your development and progression. Reflective practice is NOT easy but is critical to your professional development. It assists with increasing self-awareness which is a key foundation of emotional intelligence, it enables you to make intelligent decisions about how to move ahead with your learning requirements and about your future career plans. The structure of this reflection encourages you to reflect strategically on what you have learned through progressing through the PIIT unit and hopefully encourages you not only to think about your next stage of development but the importance of lifelong learning. The concept of professionalism is strongly associated with the skills of reflection and lifelong learning. Page 1 of 3 This assignment has two parts. There is an expectation that references are used to support your discussion in Part A and Part B. Your determination of an appropriate number of references is required. Part A (approx. 1500 words) For your reflection on Interpersonal Issues you must answer the THREE (3) compulsory questions (see below) and TWO of the optional questions (see below). Do NOT answer all questions. You will be assessed on evidence of the level of your critical analysis and reflection on these topics through connections to theory, references, class activities and your own self-paced learning. Compulsory items – Answer A & B: A. What was your goal/motivation in deciding to embark on the type of degree you are studying? When you enrolled into PIIT, how did you envisage PIIT fitting into your overall goal/motivation? Has the unit made you re-evaluate the type of degree or major/specialisation you have chosen and the career path you had planned? How have your aspirations and plans changed because of what you have learnt in the unit? B. Describe how YOU have taken ownership of your own learning in this unit. How did you seek out extension material, go deeper in pursuit of knowledge, what methods did you use (for example did you Link-in with industry guests, did you subscribe to industry e-zines, social media feeds, did you become a member of a professional body, did you attend a networking event or visit the Swinburne Careers Service. In what ways, did you contribute to a sound team performance? What could you have done better to make sure your team worked better? How could you have helped others in your team to perform better? A unit of study cannot provide ALL foundational and extension learning on a particular body of knowledge. As learners, we should seek out our own pathways to knowledge to continue along the trajectory of being an ICT professional. C. As a postgraduate student, what is the importance/value of Professional Education (i.e. education about/on issues relating to your chosen ICT future career) to you? How can a unit of study on professional education better prepare you for induction into an ICT career? How can such a unit of study deliver to you, the value which you seek? Other items – choose ANY TWO: • • • • What are your most memorable moments of PIIT, and why, with emphasis on your learning? What are some of the key professional roles and responsibilities for a modern ICT Professional? How might these affect you in your future work? How did you judge your level of Professionalism, Legitimacy and Competency in the field of ICT before you began this unit and how will you judge these qualities when you are working in industry? (An acceptable answer is “I didn’t judge, hadn’t thought about it before” … but your marker will want you to describe further, e.g. why you didn’t think about the issues etc.) What kinds of changes do you feel have occurred to the way you perceive the work of ICT professionals during this unit? Part B (approx. 700 words) For the IT-related issues reflection you need to select TWO (2) of the weekly learning topics and provide an analysis of each in terms of how they have had an impact (or not) on you and your way of thinking about being an ICT professional faced with certain issues. Page 2 of 3 Each reflection should be around 350 words (approximately one page). Some of the same questions for individual issues discussed in Part A as above may apply and you should especially note if you changed your view or gained new knowledge as a as a result of the learning activity. This assignment may be too personal to share with your group. The reflection provided will be treated in confidence by the tutor. Criteria Used to Assess Assignment 3 The following criteria will be used to assess your work. Considering these criteria and the assessment rubric will provide further guidance about what is expected. • • • • • Content coverage (Weighting 30%) Evidence of Personal Growth (Weighting 20%) Analysis (Weighting 30%) The level of connection to unit ULO’s and learning content. (Weighting 10%) Writing quality, presentation and clarity of discussion (Weighting 10%) Submission Requirements • • • • • • • • Assessments must be submitted via the Canvas unit site through the Turnitin submission link. Do not email the assessment to either the Convenor or tutor unless requested to do so. Keep a backup of your submission. If your assessment goes astray, whether your fault or ours, you will be required to reproduce it. The assessment should be in one single Microsoft Word document and generally, should be written in 12-point font size and should use 1.5-line spacing between each line. Pages of the assessment should have footers which include your name, student ID, unit code, assessment title and page numbers. It is expected that all work submitted, will have been edited for spelling, grammar and clarity. The standard procedure is that assessments will be marked up to the specified word count only. The word count does not include the reference list and/or appendices. Extensions and Late Submission Please reread the section on extensions and late submission in the Unit Outline. Plagiarism Please reread the section on plagiarism in the Unit Outline. Assessment Help If you have any queries or concerns you may discuss them with the Convenor and/or tutor in the Blackboard discussion board in the appropriate discussion forum or by email. Technical Help Technical assistance can be obtained from the Swinburne Service Desk: servicedesk@swin.edu.au or (03) 9214 5000. Page 3 of 3