This essay contains two parts, and is worth 5 points. Please make sure you answer both parts. In order to complete this essay, first choose two among the following criminological theories: Choice Theory, Trait Theory, Social Structure Theory, Social Process Theory, Strain Theory, Critical Theory, and Developmental Theory.
Part I: In approximately one paragraph per theory, identify the following characteristics of each of the criminological theories you’ve chosen: Its origin, major theorist(s), time period, its major premise, any subtheories related to it, and the key ideas associated with it.
Part II: Now identify a particular type of crime or criminal act (ie., rape, burglary, murder, robbery, shoplifting, terrorism, white collar crime, etc.) and apply each theory that you’ve chosen to that crime. Explain and discuss whether or not the theory adequately explains this type of crime. If you believe it does, defend your reasoning. If you believe it does not, thoroughly explain why it does not.
SUBMIT A MICROSOFT WORD DOCUMENT (TIMES NEW ROMAN, FONT SIZE 12, DOUBLE SPACED, APA FORMAT AS NECESSARY) AS AN ATTACHMENT
Slide 1 of 1
UNFORMATTED ATTACHMENT PREVIEW
.1 and/or backgrounds experts .75 Explanation of issues Issue/problem to be Issue/problem to be Issue/problem to be Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated considered critically is considered critically is considered critically is stated clearly and described stated, described, and stated but description leaves without clarification or comprehensively, delivering all clarified so that some terms undefined, description relevant information necessary understanding is not ambiguities unexplored, for full understanding. seriously impeded by boundaries undetermined, omissions. / unknown Owl. Evidence Information is taken from Information is taken from Information is taken from Information is taken from Selecting and using source(s) with enough source(s) with enough source(s) with some source(s) without any information to interpretation/evaluation to interpretation/evaluation to interpretation/evaluation, but interpretation/evaluation. investigate a point of develop a comprehensive develop a coherent not enough to develop a Viewpoints of experts are view or conclusion analysis or synthesis. analysis or synthesis. coherent analysis or taken as fact, without Viewpoints of experts are Viewpoints of experts are synthesis. Viewpoints of question. questioned thoroughly. subject to questioning are taken as mostly fact, with little questioning. Influence of context Thoroughly (systematically Identified own and others’ Questions some Shows an emerging and assumptions and methodically) analyzes assumptions and several assumptions. Identifies awareness of present own and others’ assumptions relevant contexts when several relevant contexts assumptions (sometimes and carefully evaluates the presenting a position. when presenting a position. labels assertions as relevance of contexts when May be more aware of assumptions). Begins to presenting a position. others’ assumptions than identify some contexts when one’s own (or vice versa) presenting a position. Student’s Specific position (perspective, Specific position position Specific position (perspective, position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis) is (perspective, (perspective, thesis/hypothesis) is stated, thesis/hypothesis) imaginative, taking into thesis/hypothesis) takes thesis/hypothesis) but is simplistic and obvious. account the complexities of into account the acknowledges different an issue. Limits of position complexities of an issue. sides of an issue. (perspective, Others’ points of view are thesis/hypothesis) are acknowledged within acknowledged. Others’ points position (perspective, of View are synthesized within thesis/hypothesis). position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis). Conclusions and Conclusions and related Conclusion is logically tied Conclusion is logically tied Conclusion is inconsistently related outcomes (consequences and to a range of information, to information (because tied to some of the Outcomes (implications implications) are logical and including opposing information is chosen to fit information discussed; related and consequences) reflect student’s informed viewpoints; related the desired conclusion); outcomes (consequences and evaluation and ability to place outcomes (consequences some related outcomes implications) are evidence and perspectives and implications) are (consequences and oversimplified. discussed in priority order. identified clearly implications) are identified clearly. Specific positic